Cases

All of our briefs are linked on their respective case pages. If they are helpful to you as an attorney or pro se litigator, please feel welcome to use them.

Williams v. Borrego
Appellate Litigation Phoebe Mesard Appellate Litigation Phoebe Mesard

Williams v. Borrego

Rights Behind Bars, along with the law firm Jones Day, represents Charles Williams, an incarcerated man in Colorado. A devout adherent to Native American religious practices, his prison collectively punished the Native Americans in their prison by prohibiting their use of tobacco for religious pipe ceremonies when a non-Native incarcerated person was caught with unrelated tobacco.

Read More
Hoffman v. Preston
Appellate Litigation Phoebe Mesard Appellate Litigation Phoebe Mesard

Hoffman v. Preston

Partnering with the law firm Covington and Burling, Rights Behind Bars represents Marcellas Hoffman, who was incarcerated in a California prison when a correctional officer offered to pay other incarcerated people to assault him and spread rumors he hoped would lead to an attack on Hoffman.

Read More
Munoz v. CDCR
Appellate Litigation Phoebe Mesard Appellate Litigation Phoebe Mesard

Munoz v. CDCR

Rights Behind Bars represents Rick Munoz in his appeal of the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) on his claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Read More
Taylor v. Riojas
Appellate Litigation Phoebe Mesard Appellate Litigation Phoebe Mesard

Taylor v. Riojas

Rights Behind Bars filed a petition for rehearing en banc to the Fifth Circuit on behalf of Trent Taylor. The court granted Texas state prison officials qualified immunity notwithstanding Mr. Taylor's claim that forcing him to live naked in prison cells covered in human sewage for nearly a week was an unconstitutional condition of confinement. The Supreme Court summarily reversed the Fifth Circuit decision granting qualified immunity to prison officials.

Read More